Elearning concepts and themes

learning grid

Matrix for analyzing elearning concepts

Elearning is a more undefined way of learning whereby the exploratory path holds a broader transition into unknown areas. The tools have new terminology alongside the product… lurking… blogging… virtual classrooms and so forth so that is why we think of elearning as a distinct discipline with a need for its own concepts and vocabulary?

Formal and informal learning becomes very blurred in e-learning
Much can be learnt through peer recommendation via informal means. Twitter is one such tool that can jump in and out of so called traditional boundaries. Followers can be a mix of peers, tutors, family, heroes, heroines and so forth with each having an opinion about something. Educational institutions face dilemmas in embracing facebook or not and both arguments hold very valid reasons for doing so.

Creating the grid above was difficult as every learning opportunity hold a different learning context. Flexible learning might have once been considered a traditional part-time course but today it can also take on an entirely different meaning in learning such as dip-in/dip-out, modular online virtual classrooms with remote peer groups and tutors.

Two different axes for such an learning grid
I still think there is a great deal of traditional learning that me must not lose sight of. I remember some 25 years ago my daughter had this bear with a cassette tape inside it which told her a goodnight story. She loved that bear and it made a big impression on her life – it’s still knocking around in the attic somewhere. What I am trying to say is there has to be a balance somewhere, technology can only do so much, that bear was only a tiny part of her life but it had clout when it came to loyalty.

Today, I do find technology very frightening because of its sheer power. I also think much of social media has unrealised implications – both good and bad. So my axes would be about the unknown and unrealised outcomes elearning has which goes to make a well rounded individual that fits into society as we currently know it. I haven’t figured out what to call these axes yet, still thinking about it.

Exploring Innovation in E-learning

- Does an innovation have to be useful?
- Is it always disruptive?
- Does it lead to far-reaching changes in practice?
- How does innovation come about?

From my experience of innovation in elearning, I do think it needs to be useful, otherwise it serves no real purpose – innovation has to do something that helps the process of learning somehow. Innovation does not need always to be disruptive, as it may well complement and bolster existing practice, it can be disruptive whereby former practice becomes obsolete. An example being pigeonholes and student communication. All student correspondence is handled by email and the VLE; paper-based timetables pinned on faculty noticeboards simply don’t exist in many institutions. Technology and student expectations has been the driver for this change and institutions, once able to meet this demand, can go on to deliver a far more holistic teaching experience.

Innovation in elearning comes about by using technology in new ways. Currently there is a host of elarning tools that have intended purpose, but by exploring and approaching concepts from different perspectives and practices, new formulas emerge that can produce unintended results in both good and bad ways.

Many cloud based tools that scatter the Internet hold great potential for new uses. Twitter and Facebook have demonstrated uses that go beyond the creator’s wildest dreams, social media, Arab Spring, London riots all come to mind. But these are not exhaustive as new combinations of traditional methods being re-interpreted into digital settings provide unknown dimensions of potential learning.

From my own learning stance, opportunities need to exist that allow time and exploration ‘to become acquainted’ with new technologies. This paves a way that best suits my own learning journey which may not be innovative to others, but the process becomes innovative in the sense that I am encountering a unique path of my own learning which brings about an interpretation that is significant to this digital footprint.

Innovation in the sense of new technology (iPads, iPhones, Whiteboards, etc) can be far reaching in terms of how they are used from a personal perspective. In terms of new teaching innovations in using this technology the variables are infinite as each student group brings along a new dynamic with socio-economics and geographical factors not withstanding.

Does Video Conferencing work – depends on the facilitator.

My experience of video conferencing has been very mixed and it is normally down to the way it has been planned and manner delivered. In my own experience people are far happier using the text box to communicate their opinions over speaking into the microphone. Interestingly and speaking from experience, the more important the attendee, the less likely they are to talk openly in the forum. From a learner’s perspective I prefer the nature of asynchronous dialogue as it allows time for reflection and considered response.

Here’s some real innovation:

What facebook knows about you

Something that really does not surprise me.

I guess Twitter could tell the same story…

More proof that Facebook keeps all deleted messages and images – read the full story – how Facebook is not playing ball with Data Protection and Freedom of Information

Typesetting, Typeface and Dyslexia

Typesetting is an old word now, but I’m trying to describe a mix of uppercase/lowercase alpha characters alongside numerals, so for now I will refer to typesetting because that’s what we do when we apply these to a page.

I’m one of those people that struggle with block text presented in uppercase, in fact I also struggle with combination of uppercase letters and numbers such as RFPR2201 – there’s just nothing memorable about it for me. Besides not being able to remember such arrangements, they are hard to read smoothly, coming across as tongue twisters – try saying RFPR2201 quickly. Does this make me dyslexic I wonder? If we consider changing the pattern of this code, which version do you find more memorable? I’ve place them in an order I find most memorable and less difficult to say…

  1. rFPr2201
  2. RFpr2201
  3. rfPR2201
  4. rfpr2201
  5. rFPR2201
  6. Rfpr2201
  7. RfpR2201
  8. RFPR2201

Again, ordering by ease and memorability, the connections I make are denoted by a hyphen acting as a pause:

  1. r-FP-r-2201
  2. RF-pr-2201
  3. rf-PR-2201
  4. rfpr-2201
  5. r-FPR-2201
  6. R-fpr-2201
  7. R-fp-R-2201
  8. RFPR-2201

Typeface also plays a strong role in setting triggers in memory and legibility. I came across Christian Boer’s Dyslexie typeface, which is especially designed for people with dyslexia. Research by the University of Twente in Holland showed that people with dyslexia made fewer mistakes reading with the typeface Dyslexie compared to standard fonts. Dyslexie has distinct differences between each character such as placing emphasis on certain parts of the letter which makes it easier to recognize against similar letterforms.

The side of Twitter I don’t understand

I found this animation by Current News which takes a satirical view of Twitter and the ways people use it. It shows a side of of this technology that I can’t understand, meaning why do people even bother broadcasting their banal life to others, what exactly is the point? The animation hints about the friendships developed on Twitter, from a professional standpoint, I can understand this concept, as knowledge and networking opportunities can be developed by shared interests, but why would anyone bother otherwise?

Click here for Twouble with Twitters animation
I’ll be exploring this theme more over the next month and will review my current stance. One thought is that if I had no friends and not much else to do, Twitter would be a platform to pass time and maybe make connections on a social basis… Lets hope that never happens – God forbid!

Personal Learning Environments

Personal learning environments begin with the interface you are using, so for example my mobile PLE will have different uses to my laptop PLE, and my desktop PLC is different again as this is purely work related. Since moving away from web design and into learning technologies, my repertoire of tools has changed and with that different drivers to learn new tools. So my PLEs reflect my career and interests.

In my diagram I have not attempted to map paths or learning journeys as this would be futile meaning I may be using a number of tools at the same time as well as mixing up tasks – meaning I will answer email, write an essay and dip into the web every now and again for some diversion.

More PLE Diagrams from edtechpost

In terms of VLEs v PLEs, I believe there is room for both, as Martin Weller refers to in his Using learning environments as a metaphor for educational change, the embed code allows the cloud based tools into the VLE and likewise, data can be pushed out to FB (if it really has to, but I’m not in favour of this).

In terms of students knowing all about using these wonderful tools, I wonder just how true this is. I suspect many don’t know how to discern found information just as many will not use social bookmarking tools such as Diigo or micro-blogging such as Twitter for learning. I ‘m in favour of supporting students to use these tools when they first arrive at university so they get a good grounding and realise the great benefits of sharing information. I am speaking from a learner perspective as I had no real idea how powerful social booking and networking was in a formal context.

In terms of issues, some students will require more support and course teams should be aware of this.

4Cs: Communication, Collaboration, Critical thinking and Creativity

It’s good to share!

by The Partnership of 21st Century Skills

Above & Beyond is a story about what is possible when communication, collaboration, critical thinking and creativity take center stage in schools and transform learning opportunities for all kids.

Lectures – what’s the problem?

I’m frankly fed-up of hearing about how boring students are finding their lectures (Anderson 2003) and how laptops should be included along with iphones, twitter etc. When I was at university, I really enjoyed 95% of my lectures and I considered these as something unique to my learning experience. Some of my lecturers made very memorable impressions in their delivery, alongside the old-fashioned carousel slide projector, that sometimes failed to work:)

Not everything has to be obviously interactive. I interacted mentally with the most outstanding lectures through imagination and thought process.

If lectures are so boring, then the fault lies with the deliver, not the medium.

Old-Fashioned Slide Projector

references: Terry Anderson – Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction

Institutions and new technologies – never the twain shall meet

Sometimes I wonder at technology and all the fuss it causes… just as things are running smoothly, along comes another technology ‘we simply must have’ and everything seems to become extremely difficult. Regardless of the fact new technologies requiring some integration (resources) require a business case, then a board of management decides if the cause is worthy. So Conole (2011) is correct in her statement when she states we need a radical change that requires a top-down approach and with this, strategy and policy are needed to ensure the change is systemic. Clear strategic vision and in-depth understanding of new technologies are required from this top level, and as she states, ‘it is debatable as to whether most senior managers have the appropriate skills to accomplish this’.

From my own experience, a practitioner wanting to use a new technology legitimately within an institution has many barriers to cross, not least the resourcing of implementing a new technology. Take WordPress as an example, and the ability to host the software on an institutional server. Issues such a server space, bandwidth and ownership come into play. Who will pay for the resource and hardware-  and the time element sparing someone to set it up? It seems people pass such requests from meeting to meeting and something far more important comes along in the meantime that needs fixing (like the finance system) so new technologies take a back seat.

Beyond the senior management knowing a good thing when it comes (or not), there’s the IT crowd and the resource and knowledge expertise they have, this really does becomes a dependant factor. Is there a good captain at the helm who is able to select a good team with a thirst for delivery? But to be fair, we do have a huge problem of speed – that is the speed in which these technologies come and go like High Street Fashion. How can these institutions keep up with the pace – by knee jerk reactions, I think not. It is little wonder people go off quietly and use the cloud – the good old cloud!

My practice has changed considerably with the Cloud and Google in particular. Using a word document now for something I will be sharing with others makes no sense whatsoever, so where possible I use a Google document. Another example being, a colleague need to complete a work request (word document) from home urgently but did not have word installed, she was able to upload the document into Google docs, complete the required fields, download it and send it on. We use wikis to record all our department meetings, from the agenda through to the action points. We use Google docs to write collaborative documents such as powerpoints, word and spreadsheets. In terms of communication, my smartphone gives me 24/7 access to internet, email, people and play.

In terms of how new technology has changed education, students arrive at university expecting to have all their project briefs, timetables and supporting study material online in the VLE. They also expect help and support 24/7 taking the notion of anytime, anyplace quite literately. Students also expect their tutors to be confident in technology – which often is not the case. From my own experience, universities are failing to implement external use policies to safeguard both the institution and students from the many perils using cloud services encounter – such as copyright, privacy and ownership.

Besides these more domestic arrangements, modules of study are not embracing new technologies and their designs are shrouded by old methods that do not pertain to the real world of work, progression and professionalism.

How can Twitter be used well in the classroom?

I’ve been searching around for really good examples of how Twitter is used in education and found the following video which hears the students viewpoints as well as the teacher.

Would appreciate any links to good examples of Twitter practice in your comments.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers